#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U204407:145.3
2.Atletico-MG U204406:104
3.America MG U204407:53
4.Athletico-PR U204408:32.8
5.Atletico GO U204402:82.5
6.Fluminense U204404:31.8
7.Goias U203309:75.3
8.Santos U203309:65
9.Ceara U203308:64.7
10.Palmeiras U203305:43
11.Flamengo RJ U203305:32.7
12.Corinthians U203302:62.7
13.Botafogo U204314:62.5
14.RB Bragantino U204314:52.3
15.Fortaleza U203303:42.3
16.Cuiaba U203305:22.3
17.Bahia U203302:31.7
18.Internacional U202203:64.5
19.Gremio U202204:12.5
20.Cruzeiro U202204:12.5
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U204407:145.3
2.Atletico-MG U204406:104
3.Goias U203309:75.3
4.Santos U203309:65
5.Ceara U203308:64.7
6.Palmeiras U203305:43
7.America MG U204317:53
8.Athletico-PR U204318:32.8
9.Botafogo U204314:62.5
10.Atletico GO U204312:82.5
11.Fortaleza U203303:42.3
12.Cuiaba U203305:22.3
13.Internacional U202203:64.5
14.Flamengo RJ U203215:32.7
15.Corinthians U203212:62.7
16.Gremio U202204:12.5
17.RB Bragantino U204224:52.3
18.Cruzeiro U202114:12.5
19.Fluminense U204134:31.8
20.Bahia U203122:31.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U204407:145.3
2.Goias U203309:75.3
3.Santos U203309:65
4.Atletico-MG U204316:104
5.Botafogo U204314:62.5
6.Ceara U203218:64.7
7.Internacional U202203:64.5
8.Athletico-PR U204228:32.8
9.Flamengo RJ U203215:32.7
10.Corinthians U203212:62.7
11.RB Bragantino U204224:52.3
12.Palmeiras U203125:43
13.America MG U204137:53
14.Atletico GO U204132:82.5
15.Gremio U202114:12.5
16.Cruzeiro U202114:12.5
17.Fortaleza U203123:42.3
18.Cuiaba U203125:22.3
19.Fluminense U204134:31.8
20.Bahia U203122:31.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U204407:145.3
2.Santos U203309:65
3.Goias U203219:75.3
4.Ceara U203218:64.7
5.Internacional U202203:64.5
6.Atletico-MG U204226:104
7.RB Bragantino U204224:52.3
8.Palmeiras U203125:43
9.America MG U204137:53
10.Athletico-PR U204138:32.8
11.Flamengo RJ U203125:32.7
12.Corinthians U203122:62.7
13.Botafogo U204134:62.5
14.Atletico GO U204132:82.5
15.Cruzeiro U202114:12.5
16.Fluminense U204134:31.8
17.Gremio U202024:12.5
18.Fortaleza U203033:42.3
19.Cuiaba U203035:22.3
20.Bahia U203032:31.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Goias U203219:75.3
2.Sao Paulo U204227:145.3
3.Ceara U203218:64.7
4.Atletico-MG U204226:104
5.Santos U203129:65
6.Internacional U202113:64.5
7.Palmeiras U203125:43
8.America MG U204137:53
9.Athletico-PR U204138:32.8
10.Atletico GO U204132:82.5
11.Flamengo RJ U203035:32.7
12.Corinthians U203032:62.7
13.Botafogo U204044:62.5
14.Gremio U202024:12.5
15.Cruzeiro U202024:12.5
16.RB Bragantino U204044:52.3
17.Fortaleza U203033:42.3
18.Cuiaba U203035:22.3
19.Fluminense U204044:31.8
20.Bahia U203032:31.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Goias U203219:75.3
2.Sao Paulo U204227:145.3
3.Santos U203129:65
4.Ceara U203128:64.7
5.Atletico-MG U204136:104
6.America MG U204137:53
7.Internacional U202023:64.5
8.Palmeiras U203035:43
9.Athletico-PR U204048:32.8
10.Flamengo RJ U203035:32.7
11.Corinthians U203032:62.7
12.Botafogo U204044:62.5
13.Atletico GO U204042:82.5
14.Gremio U202024:12.5
15.Cruzeiro U202024:12.5
16.RB Bragantino U204044:52.3
17.Fortaleza U203033:42.3
18.Cuiaba U203035:22.3
19.Fluminense U204044:31.8
20.Bahia U203032:31.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Goias U203129:75.3
2.Sao Paulo U204137:145.3
3.Santos U203129:65
4.Ceara U203128:64.7
5.America MG U204137:53
6.Internacional U202023:64.5
7.Atletico-MG U204046:104
8.Palmeiras U203035:43
9.Athletico-PR U204048:32.8
10.Flamengo RJ U203035:32.7
11.Corinthians U203032:62.7
12.Botafogo U204044:62.5
13.Atletico GO U204042:82.5
14.Gremio U202024:12.5
15.Cruzeiro U202024:12.5
16.RB Bragantino U204044:52.3
17.Fortaleza U203033:42.3
18.Cuiaba U203035:22.3
19.Fluminense U204044:31.8
20.Bahia U203032:31.7