#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Palmeiras U2044015:44.8
2.Cuiaba U204408:73.8
3.Bahia U204408:43
4.Santos U204406:52.8
5.Cruzeiro U204405:62.8
6.Sao Paulo U203306:105.3
7.Atletico-MG U203308:75
8.Flamengo RJ U203307:54
9.Athletico-PR U203305:63.7
10.Ceara U204316:73.3
11.Botafogo U203305:43
12.Atletico GO U203304:42.7
13.America MG U203303:52.7
14.Goias U203303:42.3
15.Gremio U203306:12.3
16.Corinthians U203301:52
17.RB Bragantino U203302:31.7
18.Fortaleza U203301:21
19.Internacional U202202:64
20.Fluminense U203212:62.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Palmeiras U2044015:44.8
2.Santos U204406:52.8
3.Sao Paulo U203306:105.3
4.Atletico-MG U203308:75
5.Flamengo RJ U203307:54
6.Cuiaba U204318:73.8
7.Athletico-PR U203305:63.7
8.Ceara U204316:73.3
9.Botafogo U203305:43
10.America MG U203303:52.7
11.Corinthians U203301:52
12.Internacional U202202:64
13.Bahia U204228:43
14.Cruzeiro U204225:62.8
15.Fluminense U203212:62.7
16.Atletico GO U203214:42.7
17.Goias U203213:42.3
18.Gremio U203216:12.3
19.RB Bragantino U203212:31.7
20.Fortaleza U203031:21
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Palmeiras U2044015:44.8
2.Atletico-MG U203308:75
3.Flamengo RJ U203307:54
4.Cuiaba U204318:73.8
5.Ceara U204316:73.3
6.Sao Paulo U203216:105.3
7.Internacional U202202:64
8.Athletico-PR U203215:63.7
9.Bahia U204228:43
10.Botafogo U203215:43
11.Fluminense U203212:62.7
12.Atletico GO U203214:42.7
13.America MG U203213:52.7
14.Gremio U203216:12.3
15.Santos U204136:52.8
16.Cruzeiro U204135:62.8
17.Goias U203123:42.3
18.Corinthians U203031:52
19.RB Bragantino U203032:31.7
20.Fortaleza U203031:21
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Atletico-MG U203308:75
2.Palmeiras U2043115:44.8
3.Cuiaba U204318:73.8
4.Sao Paulo U203216:105.3
5.Flamengo RJ U203217:54
6.Athletico-PR U203215:63.7
7.Bahia U204228:43
8.Fluminense U203212:62.7
9.Internacional U202112:64
10.Ceara U204136:73.3
11.Botafogo U203125:43
12.Santos U204136:52.8
13.Cruzeiro U204135:62.8
14.Atletico GO U203124:42.7
15.Goias U203123:42.3
16.America MG U203033:52.7
17.Gremio U203036:12.3
18.Corinthians U203031:52
19.RB Bragantino U203032:31.7
20.Fortaleza U203031:21
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Palmeiras U2043115:44.8
2.Sao Paulo U203216:105.3
3.Atletico-MG U203128:75
4.Flamengo RJ U203127:54
5.Internacional U202112:64
6.Cuiaba U204138:73.8
7.Athletico-PR U203125:63.7
8.Ceara U204136:73.3
9.Bahia U204138:43
10.Santos U204136:52.8
11.Cruzeiro U204135:62.8
12.Botafogo U203035:43
13.Fluminense U203032:62.7
14.Atletico GO U203034:42.7
15.America MG U203033:52.7
16.Goias U203033:42.3
17.Gremio U203036:12.3
18.Corinthians U203031:52
19.RB Bragantino U203032:31.7
20.Fortaleza U203031:21
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U203216:105.3
2.Atletico-MG U203128:75
3.Palmeiras U2041315:44.8
4.Cuiaba U204138:73.8
5.Ceara U204136:73.3
6.Bahia U204138:43
7.Cruzeiro U204135:62.8
8.Flamengo RJ U203037:54
9.Internacional U202022:64
10.Athletico-PR U203035:63.7
11.Botafogo U203035:43
12.Santos U204046:52.8
13.Fluminense U203032:62.7
14.Atletico GO U203034:42.7
15.America MG U203033:52.7
16.Goias U203033:42.3
17.Gremio U203036:12.3
18.Corinthians U203031:52
19.RB Bragantino U203032:31.7
20.Fortaleza U203031:21
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U203216:105.3
2.Atletico-MG U203128:75
3.Ceara U204136:73.3
4.Cruzeiro U204135:62.8
5.Palmeiras U2040415:44.8
6.Flamengo RJ U203037:54
7.Internacional U202022:64
8.Cuiaba U204048:73.8
9.Athletico-PR U203035:63.7
10.Bahia U204048:43
11.Botafogo U203035:43
12.Santos U204046:52.8
13.Fluminense U203032:62.7
14.Atletico GO U203034:42.7
15.America MG U203033:52.7
16.Goias U203033:42.3
17.Gremio U203036:12.3
18.Corinthians U203031:52
19.RB Bragantino U203032:31.7
20.Fortaleza U203031:21